The nation's state legislatures, which are beset by party rivalry, uncompetitive elections, and gerrymandering, are a reflection of the contemporary constraints on democracy.
 |
| Image Source - Google | Image by <br><a href The New York Time |
In Washington, The Tennessee House of Representatives, which consists of 99 members, voted on Thursday to expel two of its Democratic members for organizing an anti-gun demonstration within the house.
In the election last November, sixty of them faced no opposition.
Nearly none of the remaining House contests were close. No seats switched hands from one party to the other.
Kent Syler, a professor of political science and an authority on state politics at Middle Tennessee State University in Murfreesboro, declared that "we're just not in a normal political system." "In a typical two-party system, if one party crosses a line, the opposing party normally intervenes to restrain them. They applied the brakes.
Four out of every ten state legislature seats are uncontested in general elections nationwide.
The dysfunction in Tennessee has become more the norm than the exception due to one-party rule in state legislatures across the nation, hyperpartisan politics, pervasive gerrymandering, the urban-rural divide, and uncompetitive contests.
Due to a lack of opposition, incumbent MPs face few repercussions for their actions. And since primary elections are the only ones in which they face significant opposition, a significant portion of partisans who decide their destiny in those elections also influence their legislative acts.
Republicans have total control of legislatures in 28 states (including Nebraska, which is nominally nonpartisan), and Democrats in 18, which is exacerbated by the Supreme Court's openness to gerrymandering and the geographic sorting of Republicans into rural areas and Democrats into urban areas.
Because of this power, both parties have been able to pass legislation that furthers their respective policy objectives, as would be expected, especially at this contentious time. Both sides have exploited their authority to gerrymander to varying degrees.
However, many experts assert that Republican-led states are adopting extreme stances on restricting voting and bending or disobeying other democratic standards, as Tennessee did when it expelled two members last week.
Since the Civil War, there had only been two expulsions from the Tennessee House prior to Thursday.
 |
| Image Source - Google | Image by <br><a href The New York Time |
One-party control in Democratic states like Illinois, according to Steven R. Levitsky, a professor of government at Harvard University and co-author with Daniel Ziblatt of the book "How Democracies Die," has frequently resulted in corruption and the abuse of power.
However, he claimed that, unlike recent Republican-controlled states, Democratic-controlled states have not attempted to limit voting, curtail civil liberties, or challenge democratic principles.
Only one party, in my opinion, is currently fumbling around with dictatorship, said Professor Levitsky.
Republicans in Tennessee said that their decision to eject Democratic legislators was motivated not just by last week's demonstrations but also by a history of ostentation and interruptions that they claimed constituted the actual threat to the democratic process of the legislature.
Rep. William Lamberth, a member of the Republican leadership, said following the expulsions, "My people deserve to be heard as well, and you can't have that with folks in the well with a megaphone." In the intervening time, in advance of the special elections later this year, Representatives Justin Jones of Nashville and Justin Pearson of Memphis have been re-elected by their respective local governing bodies.
Republican Victor Ashe, a former mayor of Knoxville who served in the legislature in the 1980s when Republicans were in the minority, claimed that since then, the legislature has grown more acrimonious and his party has grown more extremist. He claimed that "some people don't think about 'This is not democracy'" in the midst of party conflict.
He stated, "They just have a different mindset," in reference to Republicans and certain Democrats in the legislature. The notion that your opponent need not be your enemy seems to have disappeared once you are elected.
Expulsions take place at a time when legislatures in Tennessee and other states are pushing against established boundaries of legislative authority.
 |
| Image Source - Google | Image by <br><a href The New York Time |
Republican lawmakers drew a gerrymander last year that divided Nashville's Democratic-held congressional district, which has represented the city since Tennessee became a state, into three, extending well outside the city and into typically Republican areas. Tennessee was previously known for its relatively moderate, pragmatic political culture.
A measure that reduced Nashville's metropolitan council from 40 to 20 members was also unilaterally enacted by the legislature, but it was temporarily halted on Monday by a judicial panel.
After Roy Cooper was elected as governor of North Carolina in 2016 and Tony Evers as governor of Wisconsin in 2018, Republican-led legislatures in those states introduced measures limiting the authority of the newly elected Democratic governors.
In Missouri, the legislature is attempting to take control of the St. Louis police force as one of the numerous actions targeted at Democratic city leaders. Many of those measures expressly renounce the long-standing power of cities to implement municipal regulations that would conflict with G.O.P. legislation on important topics like L.G.B.T.Q. rights, police enforcement, or firearms.
Republican legislatures in a number of states, including Ohio, Arkansas, Florida, and others, are proposing measures this year that would restrict people's ability to place ballot initiatives before voters, especially on topics like abortion and gerrymandering. The traditional Republican strategy now includes enacting voting restrictions, generally targeted at young voters and members of minority groups with a Democratic lean.
However, Mr. Ashe argued that since Democrats were unable to compete for a large portion of the Republican electorate during and after the Obama administration, Republicans couldn't be held responsible for their predicament in red areas.
Democrats are also at fault, according to Mr. Ashe. "They couldn't find any qualified candidates to run," He pointed out that Tennessee Republicans increased their majority by running candidates in races they were certain to lose.
Longtime Democratic congressman for Nashville, Jim Cooper, said he concurred. Local Democrats in recent years have done a bad job, according to Mr. Cooper, who served as the representative for Nashville for 20 years before resigning in January due to gerrymandering in his district by the legislature. "We're not very skilled at retaliating. For instance, we preferred having a small tent so we didn't go out and find anti-Trump Republicans.
One-party rule of state legislatures has only been solidified as a result of this political sorting into tribes where party allegiance takes precedence over regional or national interests. In stark contrast to previous decades, "it's pretty much what a voter thinks of the president that is going to dictate how a voter casts their ballot in a state legislative election," according to political scientist Steven Rogers of Saint Louis University who has studied the matter. "What legislators do for themselves really doesn't matter that much anymore."
Another reason why state lawmakers in Tennessee, as well as many other states, are frequently unopposed is that few individuals want to run or can afford to do so.
 |
| Image Source - Google | Image by <br><a href The New York Time |
"It's like a nothing job," the former lawmaker Mr. Cooper remarked of his $24,316 yearly compensation. "It might destroy your day job."
The unfortunate truth, he continued, is that excellent people no longer want to run for office. So, given that the minority 10 or 15 percent of the state legislature can control everything, we shouldn't be shocked by what we receive.
The expulsion fiasco, according to some political analysts and Nashville voters, could revive some competition. Most cited the national media blitz that made the two expelled Democrats household names and briefly rekindled the political fervor of the party.
According to Keel Hunt, a political columnist and a former top aide to Lamar Alexander, the former Republican governor and senator of Tennessee, "If there's any hope for the state Democratic Party living again, it's going to come from a rejection of that sort of inevitability of extremist control" on issues like the shooting in Nashville.
33-year-old Courtney Taylor, a native of Nashville, voted for Mr. Jones in part because of his support for social justice causes. She resides in the area that he represents. She expressed her relief that he was able to disrupt the status quo of the legislature for a few days despite the agony of the previous week.
She stated, "There has been this whirlwind of stress." "A lot of folks feel as though they have no choice. There is a feeling of irritation and helplessness. She argued that it was crucial to make the legislature pay attention.
"Having someone actively take notice of you and stand with you makes you feel a little less alone and a little less like you are screaming into the void."
